Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lucien wrote: > > Steven Blutter wrote: > > <Would love to use it on my > <M'3's as the 40 should just about cover the entire VF (outside the 50mm > <bright lines). > > That's smart. What a good idea. > > I don't think there is a problem, because it's a 40 mm (almost a wide-angle) > Even better, I 'm using the 90 mm elmar made for the CL on my M6 and I've make > some of my best portraits with that lens at f4 > > Lucien > > What is funny is that on the 40 mm 2,8 (400 ex., don't try to find one!) the cam > is like the cam of the regular M lenses.(the same for the lenses made for the > Minolta CLE, if I remember well)Thanks your thoughts, re: 90's, just had my collaps. f:4 cleaned and fell in love all over. As for the 40, I guess its to the darkroom we go!! Will post results (non-scientific) rgrds