Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: M3 look-a-like = M6-J
From: "Charles E. Love, Jr." <cel14@cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 16:33:35 -0500 (EST)

At 12:23 PM 2/19/97 +0100, you wrote:
>   Stephen Gandy wrote
>   > The pricing is a moral crime.  The normal M6 price is bad enough, but
>   > the M6J prices 
>   > amount to a crime against humanity---or at least against Leica
>   > photographers.
>
>You have to take into account that they developed a new lens for the M6J,
>which might not be done for nothing. The 2.8/50 is a new development,
>optically as well as mechanically.
>
>christoph
>
Yes, indeed, but Leica is selling the lens to everyone, not limiting it to
an M6J set.  So I assume that we should charge off its development costs to
general R&D, not to the cost of developing the M6J.--Charlie
Charles E. Love, Jr.
CEL14@CORNELL.EDU