Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Hi Bob,
When it comes to durability in SLR world, Leicaflex SL and SL2 come
first in my mind. As a long-time user collector of Leica M and R and
user of Nikon F2, I have never seen any incident of problems on SL or
SL2. In my book, SL and SL2 are the most durable bodies built just
like a real military tank. I have seen lots of favorable statements
regarding Nikon F2 durability too. In the past I have read tons of
stories on SL and SL2 that had survived from exploded helicopter where
the pilot died and in various other very clement situations. One of
the many things I really like about SL and SL2 over F2 is shutter
silkiness. This could be prejudiced but is so clear at least to me.
I also have R4, R4S and R6 that could not be compared with SL or SL2.
Regards,
David
seungmin@luxcom.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: most durable camera
Author: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internetmail
Date: 1/3/97 2:42 PM
In my quest for a camera I have first chosen Leica M.
Maybe I should ask some follow up questions, as it sounds like a lot of y'all
shoot SLR's as well: Is the M the most rugged and durable? I have been
reading a lot about Nikon F cameras that suggest they might be. Also,
My local Leica dealer has a VERY good deal right now on the R7. How is
that one for durability? As a side issue, which models (regardless of
brand) tend to be easiest to disassemble/assemble for repair (maybe done
by the owner rater than the repair shop)?
Thanks,
Bob