Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi David, I also heard a lot about poor 28-70. It sounds like it is a black sheep of the Leica family. When it comes to 35-70, I know there are two versions with filter size of E60 and E67. E60 is the first generation made in Japan (possibly by Minolta) followed by E67 made in Germany. I have noticed the price difference in the same condition was significant. I am sure design is different but wonder if the difference would be worth the price difference. In other words, I wonder if I have to pay that much more money for Germany over Japan. If the newer design is better, is the difference noticeable? This is sort of a question about German made versus Japan made. Regards, David ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Angenieux Author: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internetmail Date: 12/18/96 7:14 PM At 01:24 PM 18/12/96 -0800, someone wrote: <snip> >The [Leica] 35-70 is supposed to be an amzing zoom lens. Indeed it is. I have trouble telling it's photos from those of my 90mm Sumicron! >I believe that most, if not all of the lenses built by other >companies for the different Leica systems were built to Leica >specifications, so theoretically they should all be excellent quality >lenses, whether this is true in practice is another question. The only one I've heard not-so-good things about is the new, low-cost 28~70mm (supposedly built by Tamron[?]) - again, presumably to Leica specs. Does anybody have some first-hand experience with this lens? Best Wishes for a great holiday and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year to you all. David.