Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Fred Ward wrote: <snip> > I am currently and have been a card-carrying and accredited White House > News Photographer continuously since 1962. There is no excuse for > spreading rumors and suggesting things about the USA, the White House, > and the Clinton staff that are absurd and untrue. I am not spreading rumors and suggesting things about the USA & Co. I spoke about an experience one of my french colleagues had. It was just an example. You should read all the messages BTW... > Oddmund Garvik also wrote: > > I didn't say that this is a general procedure. But it happened in this > particular case, and probably in some other cases. I found it > interesting, but it was not meant as another anti-american accusation... > Charles E. Albertson later wrote: > Some people may find Oddmund's colleague's account a bit hard to swallow, > but this sort of behavior is not unheard of in packs of photographers, both > in the US and the UK, especially where everyone is confined to one place > (common at campaign appearances). As I've heard the stories, though, it's > usually been one of the photographers that "prescribes" the lens to use, > not a press officer for the candidate, and nobody got the boot for using a > shorter lens, unless they ran up into everyone else's shot to frame their > own. It doesn't leave much room for a different viewpoint... > <snip> Please stop picking quotations detached from its context, blowing them up to become statements I never had. Read at least *through* the messages. I don't care about the USA, the White House, or the "political" show business. I am interested in Leica and photography. That is the main topic here. I will not make further comments upon this thread. Oddmund