Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 09:59 PM 10/31/96 -0400, you wrote: >This may have been discussed before, and if so I apoligize, but how does the >latest 90 elmarit-M compare with the tele-elmarit that preceeded it? I have >the tele-elmarit and have been wondering if it is worth while upgrading (if >indeed the word upgrade is appropriate). I own the tiny tele-elmarit, and it's fine, but the grapevine says that the current 90 2.8 is truly a great lens--some say noticeably better than the 90 f2. I've been considering an upgrade myself!--Charlie Charles E. Love, Jr. 517 Warren Place Ithaca, New York 14850 607-272-7338 CEL14@CORNELL.EDU