Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:10 AM 10/6/96, Jim Bielecki wrote: >What are the thoughts and opinions of people in this group regarding the >Leicaflex SL and SL2? Good cameras? Great cameras? If given the choice, >should I opt for a used R series camera (R3) or the Leicaflex (realizing >that automation is nice but not a necessity)? How about lens compatibility? >I'm trying to find an affordable way into the Leica reflex system and am >torn between these two different options. > >BTW, I'm 45 and own an early production M3 (as well as an old Canon F1 and a >Nikon F). Jim..I will speak in favor of the Leicaflex system...I own and use an original and an SL, avoiding the SL2 for price reasons. The SL is noticeably lighter than my original. I also own and use the M3 and the Nikon F2 and find all to be "compatible" except for lens changing direction and aperture ring direction which doesn't really bother me. I like the fact that they are all "classics" from the heyday of people making great cameras. Using those older Leica bodies you can also save money on lenses by buying two cam lenses. From what I have read re the R3 and up there is nothing there to attract me unless I feel the need to support my Leica repair facility. I don't think the Germans do electric stuff that well. I think its a great way to shoot an SLR with Leica lenses and not spend a fortune. Chapel Hill, NC Although love may fail, courtesy should prevail.