Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In-Reply-To: <32559DAC.21B5@ecentral.com> > George, > > There is more, much more to lens design then just bending light. There > are so many different designs allieds,triplets,symmetrical and so on. > The main difference is the attitude of the company itself. The > Japanese (at least in 35mm) tend to build there lenses to the market > and spend very little in Yen on there raw material (glass). Zeiss and > Leitz tend to build there lenses to a certain high criteria. They pay > a large amount of Marks for there raw material (high refractive index > glass). After spending all this money they then decide what the price > will be. This just isn't true, you can count the number of manufacturers of high refractive index and other specialist glasses on the fingers of one mitten, and the German lens manufacturers use the same sources as everyone else. Nikon in particular have been innovative in their use of such materials in their 'serious' lens designs (though I accept that these days they make a lot of price-driven crap). > The optical engineers are trying to acheive something that is almost > more important then mere resolution. The color and contrast that a > lens can see gives it the "character" you were talking about. This is > done with glass makeup (chemical additives) not the phisical shape. > The coating may indirectly help this ability by absorbing stray light, > but the refractive index and material makeup of the glass gives it > character. I'm afraid this smacks of the same pseudo science which one finds at the 'snake oil' end of the audiophile market, where claims are made for the performance of specialist cables (for example) which are not justified by the evidence (I had a client who was a specialist cable manufacturer, and I could tell you stories which would horrify you). Optical design is a fiercely complex field - I've done quite a bit of it myself - but it's not magic. An experienced designer can tune an optical design to produce a range of different 'looks' in the images it produces. However, like any engineer producing what are, after all, consumer products, the designer of 35mm camera lenses is under the thumb of the marketing department, and in a world where the quality of a lens is measured by the kind of limited (*desperately* limited) 'resolution' results one sees in photographic magazines, it's not surprising that less satisfactory designs become the norm. A good analogy is the gear ratios chosen for manual shift motor cars. At least one manufacturer (Alfa Romeo) was forced away from an exquisitely chosen set of ratios to one which produced better fuel consumption figures at the 'spot' speeds used in the standard MPG tests prescribed by government legislation. Of course, in the real world, the original ratios worked better, and gave greater fuel economy. dmorton@cix.compulink.co.uk | david@cassandra.compulink.co.uk | "The loss of an old man (+44) 181 450 5459 | is like the destruction | of a library" Kilburn, London, England |