Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have several older lenses, but not the Tele-Elmarit. They do not show signs of internal coating. I have found some grease on the outer surfaces on some of the lenses when I bought them. However, this was easily cleaned off. I find this conversation most amazing. I wonder if others can shed some light on this important subject. Chris At 08:28 PM 7/22/96 -0700, you wrote: >I had an interesting conversation with Don Chatterton this morning. I >inquired about a used, late model, 90mm Tele-Elmarit for my M6. With a >concerned tone in his voice he said he might have some but that he wasn't >sure what condition they were in. As he rooted around in his collection, >he explained that the lubrication used in the lenses was sperm whale oil. >The sperm whale oil evaporates when it's warm and forms an occluding film >on the interior lens surfaces over time. Since the rear element is glued >in place on the Tele-Elmarit the interior surface cannot not be accessed >for cleaning (at least not without destroying the lens). > >He said that he is able to sell only one (1) in four (4) or five (5) of >the lenses he gets. The rest he discards due to this damage. > >He had a lens that did not show the evaporation damage. I asked if the >lens would be useable five years down the road, and he was not >encouraging. > >According to him, the oil vaporization problem is not limited to the >Tele-Elmarit, but other older lenses have elements that can be cleaned. > >In conclusion he recommended a new or recent (used) lens since Leica has >switched to synthetic lubricants that do not vaporize nearly as easily. >He also felt that the optical quality of the new 90mm lenses was clearly >superior to the Tele-Elmarit and the size difference was not great. > >I am now considering a new 90/2.8 for this reason. > >I'm returning to the list after a two month absence, so if these issues >have been covered recently I apologize for the redundance. > >-Charlie > >------------------------------------------- > Charles E. Dunlap > Earth Sciences Dept. > University of Calif. > Santa Cruz, CA 95064 > > cdunlap@earthsci.ucsc.edu >408-459-5228 (office) 408-459-3074 (FAX) >------------------------------------------- > > >