Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>The point here is not my preference, but that Leica >could have easily updated the M so it would be more competitive--as I say, a >bit of automation is not a bad thing. When I bought my M, I wanted an M over the Contax G1 specifically because I wanted a non-automation camera of this size and quality. The Leica M was essentially my only option in this class of camera that wasn't 35 years old or more. The Contax G1 is a fine instrument. I borrowed one for a day from my friendly dealer and shot a couple of rolls with it. It returned splendid pictures. But the camera left me cold, I much preferred the slower operating, quieter M. The analogy is somewhat like the difference between my Rollei 35S vs my Nikon 35Ti: both are top notch cameras, but in many ways I prefer the Rollei 35S for doing photography with. Something about full manual control and a lack of servo motors to operate the camera I find very pleasing. While I wish that Leica would continue to stay at the forefront of their field in optical and mechanical quality, and there are definitely a few improvements that the M could use in details of its operation, I also hope that such can be achieved without changing the basic essence of the cameras as they are now. They provide a specific type of instrument for which there is no substitute in any other camera manufacturer's line at the present time. This is not the situation in the R models, where there are several alternative SLRs available with similar features and equivalent quality optics. I realize that my preferences are in the minority of users and that the market would have Leica turning to automation for profitability. But I was, and am, willing to pay the premium for what I currently have in Leica equipment as it suits me better (even if my bank manager frowns at me every time I visit...). I hope that this sort of thing doesn't disappear from the marketplace, as so much other stuff has, so that I don't turn into one of those old curmudgeons who can only refer to the good old days when I talk about great cameras. Godfrey