Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Guys, It may be well said, but is not scientifically correct. People cannot generally perceive 5% changes. This is why we have a system of octaves in music. Also, this is why we have stops in photography and why our Leica speeds can only be incremented by factors of two. It is therefore likely that factors of two in some other attribute (sharpness, contrast, etc.) should be easily perceived. However, I do not believe that we can easily see factors of 50% without deceiving ourselves. There is of course one exception - cost. I do not believe that people should be paying a factor of four for a 5% increase in some quality-related attribute. Contax G1 lenses cost about half of Leica lenses, but offer similar performance, if we are to believe the popular press. However, they do not seem to have the mechanical attributes of the Leica lenses. In fact, they feel cheap. Having said that, I am comparing the workmanship of a DR Summicron (15...) with that of a new chrome Summicron. I must say that I like the DR Summicron much more. I look forward to taking pictures with it. I am sure that they will have a quality of their own and one that will be quite different from modern glass. Pax et Looks, Chris >At 10:35 PM 7/14/96 -0400, you wrote: > >>price. The final 5% ALWAYS triples or quadruples the price. >> >>Leica costs money. Zeiss costs money. Rollei costs money. Quality costs >>money -- if you want junk, then buy cheap. >> > >Marc, > >That is the point. Well said. > >=================== >Eric Welch >Grants Pass (OR) Daily Courier >NPPA Region 11 JIB chair > >Diplomacy: Say nice doggie until you find a *BIG* stick > > >