Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm confused about the thinking behind this new lens...it appears heavier, slower to use and bigger than the predecessor...it also is reportedly sharper and has a lower list price. But what is the thinking here? The 70-210 is a sleeper. It weighs less than the 135mm f2.8 Elmarit-R (at about 720 grams), has focus and zoom on one ring, and is very sharp for what it is...I've made 16X20's shot on Tri-X with this lens that really sing. While used for less than 5% of my work, I always carry this lens. I'm concerned that the successor will be slower and more cumbersome to use...it has two different rings for focus and zoom but more importantly its considerably heavier (in fact the new 80-200 is 45% heavier than the 70-210!). I always welcome better sharpness, I go out of my way for it...on the other hand, I feel I'm giving up too much of what works for me -- light weight and speed of use. Right now I'm not running out to sell the 70-210 to make room for new glass. Anyone want to talk me into the new zoom? Michael Hintlian