Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Film choice: Durability... -Reply
From: Eric Welch <ewelch@gp.magick.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1996 18:12:33 -0700

At 01:29 AM 7/6/96 -0500, you wrote:

>And, I still GET A BIG THRILL seeing those 35mm Leica-produced visual
jewels on the 
>light table...seemingly popping out of their 35mm mounts with breath-taking 
>brilliance...a testimony to Solm and Toronto lenses.
>
>Maybe I'm getting old, but I just can't find the same romance in looking at a 
>pixel-image on a CRT...

Jack,

Even though I make my living with neg film when necessary, I still shoot
chrome whenever possible, because it is so much easier to edit. I don't like
looking a raw scans on the computer either, because the color is off and the
exposure is off (not mine, the computer's). Though when I put one of my
transparencies in the computer as a screen blanker, it's got a nice
slide-like glow to it because of the phosphor glow of the CRT. If done well,
it looks good. Not as good as a 30 foot screen obviously, but it sure beats
flying toilets.

 And I am with you, there's something special about that little chunk of
film. Maybe it's the fact that I learned photography on Kodachrome, at the
same time I learned black and white, but color was my film of choice for
most things. It still is. We all have our own points of view. Picking the
tools to realize our vision is one of the fun parts of it. As long as it
doesn't get in the way of actually making pictures. 


==========================
Eric Welch
Grants Pass Daily Courier


Replies: Reply from Jack Hamilton <jackham@execpc.com> (Re: Film choice: Durability... -Reply)