Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/06/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 06:34 PM 6/5/96 -0700, you wrote: >You don't extrapolate between things, Eric, you extrapolate from things and >use that data to support a conclusion. You can't say that because a given >lens is great in the M line that its analog will be equally as good in the R >line and visa versa. Well, that's true, but I don't remember using the term extrapolate anyway except in response to a previous post. And I never made such a claim anyway, except maybe when it is the same lens in different wrappers, such as the 90 Elmarit or the 135 Elmarit. As for the 35s in the R system, or the M system, I never claimed they would be equally good, but was pointing out they weren't. But I was surpised by how much better the R Summilux is than the M Summciron. Comparisons are fair game. ========================== Eric Welch Grants Pass Daily Courier