Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Adaptall vs Leitz Glass
From: jbuf@ix.netcom.com (John Irvin Buford)
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 23:26:06 -0700

You wrote: 

>The Question:
>
>I've been told this is so, because even though the mechanism is made 
in
>Japan, the actual optical elements are either a) made in Germany by 
Leica,
>or b) made in Nippon out of glass blanks sent from Leica's glass works 
and
>to Leica's specs; rather than simply being made by Minolta. Others say 
this
>is hogwash. That it is an all Minolta design/manufacture effort; and 
that I
>am simply being prejudicial against Japanese technology. 
>
>Can anyone shed a ray of truth on this?  
> 
>-----------
>David Young: youngs@IslandNet.com
>
>
    Some of the leitz lenses are made by Minolta.  If you go to Solms 
they have a room full of lenses in Minolta boxes with a sticker fo 
Leica.  Take for example the 24 f2.8R, it is made by Minolta, but the 
shutter mechanism is replaced.  Leica does so much work on this 
particular lens that by International law it can be stamped made in 
Germany.  The glass is Minolta in manufacture.  I own a number of 
Minolta Manual focus lenses,  16 f2.8, 21 f2.8 and the 50 f1.2, and I 
also own the Leica 21 R lens.  The first time I used the Minolta 
lenses, IMHO the photographs looked like what I get using a Leica lens. 

 And, of course I can only speak about the manual lenses that I have 
used and I have absolutely no experience with the autofocus lens.

John N3BVH