Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:31 AM 5/27/96 -0400, you wrote: > That's interesting: in the April `96 edition of Popular >Photography, both lenses were reviewed and were given quite high praise: >PP said that they would perform better than "most" lenses in their >class and the SQF data looked pretty good. Did the posters have any >explanation for the discrepancy? Other than the fact that Pop Photo's tests are not worth the paper they're printed on? :-) And what class are these lenses in anyway? Indpendent manufacturer lenses for the Leica M? I can't think of anyone else in this category. I'd say take Pop Photo's critique with a grain of salt, since they're reviewing equipment from one of their largest, and oldest, advertisers. Does anybody here have good experiences buying from Adorama? I have only one. I found an exotic power cord for an old Canon F1 that only Adorama had, many moons ago. ========================== Eric Welch Grants Pass Daily Courier