Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can't compare them because I only have the 3.4. Ihave no interest in getting the 2.8. The Super Angulon is a superior lens IMHO. Excellent sharpness and contrast. Some vignetting wide open, but not noticable in most subjects; only those with very even tones out to the edges like a uniform blue sky. (But who shoots the sky wide open? The 2.8 may be better, I've never shot it, but it is hard to see how it could be very much better. NOTE: because of the deeply protruding rear elements, my 3.4 cannot meter on the M6. Those same deeply protruding elements make the negative image LARGER than 24x36mm. Adjacent frames nearly touch on the negative strip! kw >I'd be very interested in users opinions of >M-21's as per sharpness, fall, contast >2.8 >3.4 >Thanks! ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits Davison Middle School preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu> 600 Dayton, Davison, MI 48423 <kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org> Replied: 25 May 96 09:35