Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 09:22 AM 5/24/96 -0400, you wrote: >I would call this a second-generation CL. > >What did you mean by third generation? It might well be. My impression is that a distinction is made between the two versions of the CL, because the second was my by Minolta for Minolta's purposes, with permission of Leica, of course, and some people have told me they're not quite as good. You note implies that's not true. If so, I would have to concur the CLE is a second generation and not third. Yet, I find nothing interesting about the camera except maybe ttl flash. The manual exposure problem is probably as much as anything a lack of insight into the way a "Leica clone" should operate as to guarantee the doom of the camera. Can you tell I don't think much of them? <g> I know many who love them. I'm just not one of them. ========================== Eric Welch Grants Pass Daily Courier