Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In message <199603282001.PAA27677@gold.interlog.com>, Michael Reichmann <michaelr@interlog.com> writes >Though I believe that Leica has a bright future, if I had to choose which >will be around in 20 years, Leica or Nikon, guess which I'd choose. > >Michael I've just got some slides back taken with two old Leitz lenses, one made in 1956, the other in 1933. Both are still working perfectly. It's a strange feeling using a lens that is 14 years older than I am. Mind you, it looks its age. I'd like to think I don't ;->. I expect both of these two companies will still be around in 20 years, but I was very interested to read about Leica being 25% up last year, profit, turnover, I can't remember which, but that is the right direction to go anyway. I find that most encouraging; it suggests that in these days of electronic cameras, Leica is doing very well indeed. And going on Leica's durability and serviceability, I can safely assume my present (modern) Leicas will still be working in 40 years time, when I will be 86. That _is_ a good feeling. I wonder if _I_ will still be functioning then. -- joe b.