Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sure! The 65 is extremely sharp, especially in the near range and seems to be much flatter field than the 90. (This from shooting, not from testing.) The "near normal" focal length is more versatile than the longer lens, and it has a preset diaphragm. The main advantage of the 90 comes if you use it with the Bellows II which has scales for use with the 90. kw >At 03:51 PM 20/03/96 -0500, you wrote: >>Go for the 65! > > >Thanks Ken, > >Any particular reason why? > >Michael ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits Davison Middle School preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu> 600 Dayton, Davison, MI 48423 <kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org>