Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Re Tele-Elmarit, fat vs thin, early vs late; In message <Pine.HPP.3.91.960213105301.4298X-100000@ccshst01.cs.uoguelph .ca>, Gary J Toop <gtoop@uoguelph.ca> writes > Funny, I was just wondering the same thing! I would also be >curious to know how the two Tele-Elmarits compare to older versions of >the 90/2.8 Elmarit. Brian Bower in Leica M Photography recommends the later 90/2.8 Tele- Elmarit as a smaller, lighter (and I would add, cheaper) alternative to the current 90/2.8 Elmarit-M with comparable optical quality. He specifically recommends the _later_ Tele-Elmarit. I got one of these fairly recently but haven't seen any results yet. It is appreciably smaller than the alternatives though and very pleasant to use. joe b.