Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1995/07/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Group - An update of my original post: July 29th: ^^^^^^^^^ Earlier today I responded to the question of Leica vs. SLR's in the leica_users group and reading a number of posts in this group, I thought it might be of interest here also. The original question (from I don't remember who, sorry) > >Does anyone have an opinion of buying a Leica M6 vs Nikon SLR such as > >FM2n? Thinking of optics, durability, reliability, quality of photos > >taken, etc. Thanks.> Gang Huang's Response: (From: gang@mgang@mtdcr.att.com) > None of the above is significant enough to be the basis of choosing one over > the other. It really depends on what type of photography you intend to do. To this added my $0.02 worth (edited slightly here): REMARK: 25-30 years ago I used a couple of original Nikon F's and five assorted lenses. I recently re-discovered photography and so set out about getting back in. Because of lack of use, the old Nikons have problems which are expensive to cure and so I looked into what's out there now. I re-discovered Nikon (because of all the lenses I have) and also the Leica, a camera I dreamed about back then. That was two months ago. Now I've shot about 20-25 rolls of film here and abroad with them. + + + + + + + + + + Hi - Gang Huang's response was perfect, albeit incomplete. I faced the same question as that asked originally. I ended up buying both M6 and N90s. In my case, I've discovered the following features related to each system: M6 SLR System (Nikon N90s) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Permits quiet, unobtrusive tssk...tssk...KLUNK...whirr picture taking. Pictures incredibly sharp Picture quality depends excellent contrast on lens. Some lenses superb. Lenses feel nice to operate as good as Leica's. Others OK. Very limited lens selection Incredible range of lenses No zooms. 7 lenses: to choose from. Ultra-wide angle 21mm-135mm that's it, to long_telephotos. PC-control but the most important Macro; Micro; Slide copy... focal lengths are there Viewfinder for people with N90s viewfinder superb even for glasses is LOUSY (rotten) people with glasses Focusing easy, sharp Autofocus quite good, smart, but you've got to do fast. But sometimes not critically everything - fast focused. (** See Note at bottom) Requires lots of practice Autofocus/Auto-exposure is or pre-setting camera to is incredibly good and fast. capture "the moment" (** See Note at bottom) Price outrageous (3*SLR) Price not too bad (=Leica/3) Resale value usually high Resale value so-so Metal construction Lots of plastic Exposures > 1 sec requires long exposures, no problem cable release Use of filters difficult Use of filters a snap (Exposure compensated, etc.) Leica has a nice feel to it Nikon also feels nice ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ There's probably more, but the above list is what I've found over the past month or so. The nice thing about my Nikon is that I am using lenses that I bought 25-30 years ago (in aperture priority mode) and they work just as well and are just as sharp as then (viz. the 105/f2.5 short tele is as nice as I remember it) + + + + + + + + + + And subsequently I added the additional summary remarks: Leica M6: A precision instrument. Can be used without batteris. Requires active participation by the photographer to get good pictures. Capable of truly superb photos but that requires considerable thinking, insight and/or experience. Even if only to obtain "good" or "OK" photos, requires active user thought and participation. Flash pictures require considerable participation by the user. You really have to think when using this camera. You can get involved with your subject. The quiet and silky smooth operation allow you that. I think that this will turn out to become my favorite 35 mm landscape camera and a camera for taking unobtrusive pictures of people, events (reasonably slow moving events). Each photo is a deliberate action on the photographer's part. Nikon N90s: A well-built camera. Use requires batteries. With minimal participation by the user, good pictures are usually obtained, under a diverse range of shooting conditions. Using the mating flash unit guarantees properly exposed flash pictures every time. A cinch to operate. Just press the button. With thought and insight on the photographer's part is also capable of generating great photos (I'm referring here to technical matters, i.e. properly exposed and focused photos.) A photo results every time you press the button. You can expose a 36 exposure roll of film in about 9 seconds! I use this kind of camera as a "point-and-shoot" camera as well as a complex photo taking instrument. This is a great camera for taking pictures under complex lighting situations; Uneven illumination; sport/action photos; photos with un-usual lenses (really wide angle, zooms, long-telephotos, macro and micro work, polarizing filters, etc.) ** Note: Added July 30th: I just discovered the wonderful article "The Leica Mystique" written by Carl Weese in the July/August issue of _Darkroom and Creative Camera Techniques_. Weese writes that he's been using Leica's for ages and he nicely deals with all the important issues - ergonomics, Leica lenses, the mystique, handling and technique (focusing: faster than auto-focus?). I learned a lot from this article. Interesting quote: "It's not an easy camera to use well. Proficiency with it needs to be learned, and practiced. ... with enough practice, your technical success rate will exceed that of the latest computerized wunderplastic." And even better, he tells what the Leica means to him: "The Leica is a camera for exploring the world: for looking outward, not inward. It's not a tool for exploring the pictoral possibilities of our inner thoughts, but for TAKING pictures: for snatching them out of the thin air of experience." Weese is not pushing Leica sales. He has produced what I consider a well-written essay about manual rangefinder cameras and Leica's, in particular. He debunks a lot of Leica hype and provides good insight into this very different style of photography. Recommended reading. + + + + + + + + + + I hope that I haven't belabored the point. Whatever you use, remember it's not nearly as important as you. -- W. Sachse ============================================================================= ,-----, ,-----, ,----, ,-, ,-, ,-----, ,-----, # Wolfgang Sachse | ,---; | ,-, | | ,--; | | | | | ,---; | ,---; # T&AM/Thurston Hall | `---, | |_| | | | | `--' | | `---, | `---, # CORNELL UNIVERSITY `---, | | ,-, | | | | ,--, | `---, | | ,---' # Ithaca, NY - 14853 USA ;---' | | | | | | `--; | | | | ;---' | | `---; # 607/255-5065; FAX-9179 `-----' `-' `-' `----' `-' `-' `-----' `-----' # sachse@msc.cornell.edu WWW Home Page: http://www.msc.cornell.edu/~sachse # =============================================================================