Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1994/02/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello- I have just signed on to this list and would like to take some time to introduce myself. My name is Jeff Benedict and I live in Port Townsend, WA. USA- in the Pacific Northwest. I've been interested in Leicas for years but only purchased my first two last year. I have a III and a IIIa and only a 50/2 Summar. The IIIa is pretty good- nice shape and good appearance. The III is essentially a "parts" camera which came in the deal for the IIIa. My goal in Leica collecting is to have one of each major style. I have the "earliest" style in the III and IIIa, even though a Leica A would be great (or even a D). I'd like to get a IIIc and a IIIf as well as an M-series. As we all know, Leica collecting can get very expensive, so I'm not really after the "collectable" stuff- just good, usable examples of classic cameras. I'd also like to get a selection of lenses- at least one for each camera covering the range of 35 to 135 mm. I also enjoy Leica copies. I have a Leotax F (1956) with a Canon 50/1.8- a great lens! The Russian copies look interesting as well as the Italian- wheither I get some are another question! I've seen the Fed 5C for sale for about 80 and it is supposed to work fairly well, so that's a possiblility for my collection- it has a built in meter which would be handy as a "cheap user"- much less than one of the modern point and shoots and it will take other screw thread lenses I would like to use. I'm also interested in the Zorki cameras with the long-base rangefinders- that would be handy when using a 135 lens- or one of the 200mm Komura lenses. I can't forget the Canon copies, either! I just bought a book on the Canon rangefinders- "Canon Rangefinder Cameras 1933-68" by Peter Dechert which goes into great detail about all of the differences in these cameras, including describing a modification to put the big, bad 50/.095 lens on the M-series Leica. These days, the Noctilux would hammer the Canon, but at the time, this was supposed to be the hot way to go. Another book I just got is "300 Leica Copies" by Patrice Pont and Jean-Loup Princelle. It goes into great detail about the origins of all the Leica copies (and goes as far as saying that, in a minor way, the Contax is a Leica copy!!!!) that they have heard about. If anyone on the list is interested in trying to ID a Leica copy (or something which appears to be a Leica copy), e-mail me a description and I'll try to ID it with the book. )Same with the Canon stuff!) Hope all this copy stuff doesn't cause offence- I love 'em all and like to use everything. That's my one rule about camera collecting- I have to take the stuff out a shoot it occasionally! Jeff