Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1992/10/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark Eastman writes: > [Stuff deleted] > > Generally the Leica does seem faster to focus because of the thumb > tab on certain lenses allowing one to "memorize" certain distance > positions. I found that in tight quarters with many objects in the > frame, in low light, it can be hard to line-up the rangefinder quickly. > Maybe it was because this was at close range (or the fact that I did > the shoot at two in the morning :^), but it just seemed easier to focus > the 28mm SLR lens at close range (3-6ft) than the Leica set-up. > > The clarity of the Leica finder to me makes up for the small rf rectangle > to contend with combined with the thumb tab comment above. > > Anyone other comments? Interesting, I have the opposite problem. When shooting my 90mm/f 2 wide open in low light, more of my intended subject is within that little rf rectangle. A specific thing or object (like an eye in a portrait) at the desired plane of focus is easier for me to pick out when shooting even a 50mm. I guess that when the split images occupy a more specific region of the intended framing, my results are better. I tried an M3 with the 90mm/f 2 and these guys really seemed to be made for each other. Back to your point though, I guess if I were shooting wide angles up close in low light a delta change in subject distance might require a greater percentage of focus adjustment under these circumstances. Then again, modern SLR focus screens are getting pretty bright too. Regards, Kevin